Does More Equal Better With Cancer Drugs?

The pharmaceutical industry is facing a coarseOne difficulty is that while these drug firms can
couple of years. The 'patent-expiration cliff' slatedchoose from many targets to attack, they
for 2012-2013, in which lucrative brand-namecannot define which would be most beneficial.
drugs will lose exclusiveness and face lessEven when one anomaly is targeted successfully,
expensive generics. To offset the losses they arethe carcinoma usually creates other anomalies,
expecting, many pharmaceuticals attempting toand permutations and complications so enormous
find profits have turned to oncology and creatingthat finding the right combo for a given patient's
cancer drugs.physiology is almost impossible.
This will sound like excellent news. But currentThen there's the issue of financial interest.
motivations and market conditions may actuallyInsurance corporations and regimes tend to shell
work to the detriment of pharmaceuticals andout the sums needed for cancer care with
patients alike. Today, with cancer the followingrelative ease, so drug corporations find they can
promising revenue source, a really well knowncharge high costs for drugs that barely work, on
New York-based chemical company employs onethe off-chance a given drug might save a life. Are
thousand analysts developing cancer treatments,drug companies actually attempting to find a
spends 20 percent of its $7-billion-plus researchcure? Or are they just satisfied with developing
and development budget on cancer, and hasless dramatic treatments that fill their coffers?
roughly twenty-two cancer drugs in controlledThey may not have the inducement required to
trials.develop cures or hugely improved treatments,
Pharmaceutical companies are pouring billions ofwhen they can make enough money creating
greenbacks into developing cancer drugs. Lateststopgap drugs.
systematic discoveries allowing for new targets inNaturally, pharma executives reject such a cold
cancer research have generated about 860 drugshearted conclusion. They'd gladly make better
in trials -- much more than for any otherdrugs that would offer bigger gains, they say. But
infirmities, including heart problems and stroke.this is likely tempered by the companies' and
Some critics call the excess a 'cancer bubble.'shareholders' wants.
Still, with hundreds of new potentials and billions ofThe prevailing 'cancer bubble,' with so many rivals,
greenbacks poured into cancer research, a cureso many drugs, and not enough room in the
should be approaching, right? Unfortunately, fewmarketplace for all, begs the issue of whether
drugs have made it to the market -- only one thistoday's big investments in cancer drugs will ever
year. And many of those drugs aren'tbear fruit, or if some companies and their
revolutionary treatments, but medicines thatinvestors will get burned. One drug company aims
extend life by days or months -- or, in somefor $11 bill in cancer-drug sales by 2018, more
cases, that simply stabilise the patient, and at athan quadrupling last year's sales in the whole
very high cost.category.